Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 111: 387-392. (December 1956)
© 1956 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOOSANOFF, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by NOMEJKO, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LOOSANOFF, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by NOMEJKO, C. A.

RELATIVE INTENSITY OF OYSTER SETTING IN DIFFERENT YEARS IN THE SAME AREAS OF LONG ISLAND SOUND

V. L. LOOSANOFF 1 and C. A. NOMEJKO 1

1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Milford, Conn.

1. During the 12 years of observations none of the stations, representing relatively small bottom areas, always occupied a position among the best oyster set producers.

2. If larger areas instead of individual stations were compared, a definite tendency of the Bridgeport area to be more productive than the others was evident.

3. There was no evidence that the stations located at a definite depth, such as 10, 20 or 30 feet, consistently produced better sets of oysters than the stations at other depths.

4. There may be a great variability in the density of oyster set even within a given depth and district in the same year. For example, Stations 4 and 5, although located in the same district and at the same depth, showed a rather different standing with Long-Range Ranks of 9 and 3, respectively.

5. Local minor water currents are important in the relative productivity of bottom areas.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.