Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 121: 234-256. (October 1961)
© 1961 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BUCK, J.
Right arrow Articles by CASE, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BUCK, J.
Right arrow Articles by CASE, J. F.

CONTROL OF FLASHING IN FIREFLIES. I. THE LANTERN AS A NEUROEFFECTOR ORGAN

JOHN BUCK 1 and JAMES F. CASE 1

1 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass.; Laboratory of Physical Biology, National Institutes of Health; Department of Zoology, State University of Iowa

1. Records are presented of normal spontaneous flashes and of flashes induced by a variety of electrical stimuli at a variety of anatomical sites in several species of lampyrid firefly.

2. The flashes of adult firefly lanterns have long response latencies (25 to 250 mscs. at 25° C. in different species) and durations (100 to 1000 mscs.) and can be repeated many hundred times with only slight fatigue. The response itself shows strength-duration relations and frequency responses (summation, treppe, tetany) which are similar to those of more conventional neuroeffector systems. A striking long-lasting neuroeffector facilitation is also evident.

3. Response latency lengthens with falling temperature, Q10 values for the 10°-30° range varying from about 2.4 to 1.4. Extreme temperatures slow the decay phase of luminescence preferentially, as does hypoxia.

4. The flashes of most species differ characteristically in time course, response latency and other electrophysiological properties.

5. The responses of the Photuris larva are roughly similar to those of the adult, but slower by a factor of about 10.

6. The time course of light intensity change during flashes induced under various conditions is discussed in possible relation to underlying excitation and effector mechanisms. Long lasting glows are also considered in this context.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. F. Case and F. E. Hanson
The Luminous World of John and Elisabeth Buck
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 44(3): 197 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.