Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 127: 304-316. (October 1964)
© 1964 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LUTZ, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by JENNER, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LUTZ, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by JENNER, C. E.

LIFE-HISTORY AND PHOTOPERIODIC RESPONSES OF NYMPHS OF TETRAGONEURIA CYNOSURA (SAY)

PAUL E. LUTZ 1 and CHARLES E. JENNER 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

1. Most nymphs of Tetragoneuria cynosura required one year for the completion of nymphal development in nature. Rapid growth occurred in the summer months and by the end of October, the final instar was attained which served as an overwintering diapause stage; emergence occurred in early April and May. A small percentage of the population (5-10%) exhibited growth retardation and had a lifecyle of two years. These individuals spent the first winter in stages short of the last, the summer in the penultimate stage, and the second winter in the last stage.

2. Striking differences occurred in seasonal response to photoperiods of 11 and 14 hours. Durations of the final instar for nymphs collected in August and September were much greater on the longer day-length. Following the fall equinox period, a reversal in response occurred, with the longer photoperiod inducing more rapid development in fall and winter collections. Differences in rates of response became progressively less as time of emergence approached. These results were utilized in an attempt to explain the role of photoperiod in controlling seasonal nymphal development in this species.

3. The threshold light intensity necessary to elicit a photoperiodic response was found to be extremely low, probably below 0.002 lux. More than eight, but less than twenty, long-day cycles were necessary to induce irreversibly a response similar to that of the long-day controls.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.