Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 128: 77-89. (February 1965)
© 1965 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GHIRADELLA, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GHIRADELLA, H. T.

THE REACTION OF TWO STARFISHES, PATIRIA MINIATA AND ASTERIAS FORBESI, TO FOREIGN TISSUE IN THE COELOM

HELEN T. GHIRADELLA 1

1 Department of Zoology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

1. Two starfishes, Patiria miniata and Asterias forbesi, were found to discriminate between coelomic implants of homologous and heterologous pyloric caecum obtained from donors of these species and of two others, Asterias vulgaris and Henricia sanguinolenta.

2. Homologous transplants were recovered from the hosts one to five weeks after implantation and were found to be generally normal in histological appearance, although there was some growth of connective tissue and amebocyte masses in areas which had probably been damaged during the implantation procedure. Heterologous transplants were eliminated by the hosts within a week of implantation.

3. Henricia caecum was eliminated through the dermal branchiae by both hosts. Patiria, in contrast, eliminated Asterias caecum in a still undetermined way; the tissue may have been transferred from the host ray to the cardiac stomach, and either digested there or passed out through the mouth.

4. Contrary to expectation, amebocytic attack, phagocytosis, and encapsulation were not seen to play an important role in elimination of heterologous transplants, although amebocytes were associated with damaged areas in the homologous transplants. Such amebocytic activity is probably concerned with removal of cellular debris.

5. The results of these experiments may express a general tendency of starfishes to distinguish between implants of donors of different degrees of relationship, or they may represent special cases of discrimination. More work remains to determine how specific these tolerance-rejection thresholds are and how consistently they vary with different host-donor combinations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.