Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 131: 115-126. (August 1966)
© 1966 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by KATONA, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by KATONA, S.

AN ENDOGENOUS DIURNAL RHYTHM OF BIOLUMINESCENCE IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF DINOFLAGELLATES

MAHLON G. KELLY 1 and STEVEN KATONA 2

1 Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
2 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543

Most dinoflagellate species and individuals taken from Eel Pond during this study were luminescent and these were sufficient in abundance to explain all the luminescence recorded. This is probably the case in many marine environments. Macroscopic organisms capable of luminescence were removed by filtration, and the only microplankton constituents capable of luminescence and present in sufficient numbers were dinoflagellates.

Dinoflagellate luminescence is commonly a cause of light production in surface regions of the ocean (Harvey, 1952 ; Hastings, 1963) and more knowledge is needed of the luminescent behavior of individuals and cultures of the various species. The effects of temperature, depth and other environmental conditions are unknown. Spontaneous luminescence without stimulation was observed in the laboratory, but is very variable and its extent in the natural environment is not known. Much work is needed on the ecology of dinoflagellate luminescence.

The rate of luminescent flashing of natural populations following stimulation is greatest at night, is controlled by an endogenous diurnal rhythm, and is inhibited by light. The sensitivity to light-inhibition is also controlled by an endogenous rhythm, and is greatest during midday when flashing is least. Thus in the natural environment, light-inhibition and an endogenous rhythm act together in decreasing stimulated daytime luminescence.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.