Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 134: 516-532. (June 1968)
© 1968 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YOSHIDA, M.
Right arrow Articles by OHTSUKI, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by YOSHIDA, M.
Right arrow Articles by OHTSUKI, H.

THE PHOTOTACTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE STARFISH, ASTERIAS AMURENSIS LÜTKEN

M. YOSHIDA 1 and H. OHTSUKI 1

1 Tamano Marine Laboratory, Shibukawa, Tamano, Okayama, Japan

1. The starfish, Asterias amurensis, was positively phototactic when light-adapted.

2. Shading four arms caused animals to start moving with the illuminated ray forward. The direction of changes in locomotion of moving animals was highly predictable when the animals were properly stimulated by partial shading.

3. The response of changing direction involved two phases, the initial and the later. In the initial phase, animals tended to move opposite to the shaded arm(s) and in the later phase, the direction gradually returned towards the original leading arm.

4. When moving, animals assumed a typical advancing posture. Shadows cast on them induced off-responses in the anterior three arms, but when animals were stationary, the off-response appeared in all the five arm tips. The relation of these reactions with the changing direction has been discussed.

5. Experiments using preparations lacking ocelli or arms, as well as those with the radial nerve transected, suggested that the apparent positive phototaxis was induced mainly by shadows which were perceived through ocelli. Light seemed to play a secondary role. The function of an extra-ocellar light sense was recognized, but it appeared only when all the ocelli were removed.

6. The central mechanism involved in controlling the locomotory direction has been discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.