Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 14: 219-248. (March 1908)
© 1908 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GLASER, O. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GLASER, O. C.

A STATISTICAL STUDY OF MITOSIS AND AMITOSIS IN THE ENTODERM OF FASCIOLARIA TULIPA, VAR. DISTANS

O. C. GLASER

1. During the period of cannibalism, the entoderm of Fasciolaria becomes first spindle-shaped, but later as regional differentiation occurs, the cells become cuboidal.

2. The first change can be accounted for by the stretching which the larvæ undergo; the second change is explained by a fourfold increase in the number of cells found in transverse sections through the middle of the digestive tract.

3. During this period of cell increase there was found a maximum of one mitotic division in 1,751 nuclei.

4. During the same period of development, there was found a minimum of 69 amitotic divisions.

5. From this it follows that during the period of most active cell multiplication more than I per cent. of all divisions is mitotic and more than 98 per cent. are amitotic.

6. Since there were found during the pre-cannibal, the cannibal, and the post-cannibal periods, 152 cases of what is interpreted as nuclear division, and since of these 20 were mitotic, it follows that during the entire developmental period considered a little over 13 per cent. of all the divisions were mitotic and a little less than 87 per cent. amitotic.

7. Therefore the conclusion is reached that amitosis plays in this instance an important, if not the chief part in the differentiation of a definitive tissue.

8. Of the two alternatives which might be suggested, one, that unobserved epidemics of mitosis account for the facts, is not only without foundation, but is improbable ; the other, that a fourfold increase in cells can be accounted for on the basis of I mitotic division per 1,751 nuclei involves an absurdity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1908 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.