Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 143: 513-524. (December 1972)
© 1972 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOWSE, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by PALMER, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DOWSE, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by PALMER, J. D.

THE CHRONOMUTAGENIC EFFECT OF DEUTERIUM OXIDE ON THE PERIOD AND ENTRAINMENT OF A BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM

H. BURGESS DOWSE 1 and JOHN D. PALMER 1

1 Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10453

The effect of deuterium oxide on the locomotor activity rhythm of the house mouse, Mus musculus, was measured in various environmental conditions.

1. In the initial experiments, in which mice were kept in constant low (0.2 foot candle) illumination, D2O concentrations of 5% through 30% (in 5% increments) were administered via the drinking water. Increased concentrations lengthened the period, proportionally, with 30% D2O causing a mean period lengthening of 7.4%.

2. Increasing the intensity of illumination in constant conditions can lengthen the period of the mouse locomotor activity rhythm. It was felt that deuterium might be changing the way in which the mice interpreted the light intensity, thus changing the period. Both blind mice, and mice kept in constant darkness were tested at various dosages. The results did not differ significantly from those obtained for mice in constant low illumination, thus showing D2O does not act to alter the period by changing the way in which the mice interpret light intensity.

3. Concentrations of D2O from 5% to 30% in 5% increments, were administered to mice in LD 12:12 (8). Doses up through 15% mostly caused phase shifts, at 20% some mice rephased and some were not entrained, while at the higher doses, the rhythms were not entrained to the LD cycle.

4. To test if increasing intensity of illumination in an LD cycle could diminish the perturbing influence of deuterium on the period and phase of rhythms, 20% D2O was administered to mice in LD 12:12 (0.2), and LD 12:12 (80). The rhythms of all the mice in the first category were not entrained by the LD cycle, while all the mice in the second category were entrained. These data clearly indicate that the brighter the illumination during the light interval of an LD cycle, the stronger are its entraining capabilities of D2O lengthened rhythms.

5. The results are discussed in terms of the bearing they have on clock models, and models for entrainment of rhythms to zeitgeber cycles.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
M. P. Gerkema, S. Daan, M. Wilbrink, M. W. Hop, and F. van der Leest
Phase Control of Ultradian Feeding Rhythms in the Common Vole ( Microtus arvalis): The Roles of Light and the Circadian System
J Biol Rhythms, July 1, 1993; 8(2): 151 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
H.B. Dowse and J.M. Ringo
Further Evidence that the Circadian Clock in Drosophila is a Population of Coupled Ultradian Oscillators
J Biol Rhythms, March 1, 1987; 2(1): 65 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.