Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 146: 11-19. (February 1974)
© 1974 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRADSHAW, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRADSHAW, W. E.

PHOTOPERIODIC CONTROL OF DEVELOPMENT IN CHAOBORUS AMERICANUS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PHOTOPERIODIC ACTION SPECTRA

WILLIAM E. BRADSHAW 1

1 The University of Michigan and The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University

1. Responsiveness of diapausing Chaoborus americanus larvae to photoperiod increases with chilling. Both the critical photoperiod and the number of long or intermediate days required to terminate diapause decrease at the time of year when environmental photophases are rapidly increasing. Consequently, the transition from diapause-maintaining to diapause-terminating daylengths probably takes place faster in nature than is indicated by responsiveness to static photoperiods in the laboratory.

2. After prolonged chilling, short days no longer maintain diapause and food alone suffices to evoke development. The switch from photoperiod-dependent to photoperiod-independent development takes place over only a ten day period.

3. Energies of monochromatic light from 390 to 660 nm required to elicit 10%, 50%, and 90% development were determined by extending an otherwise white light, short-day regimen to long-day with monochromatic light at dawn or at dusk. Monochromatic light at 540 nm was most effective at evoking development both during dawn and dusk but larvae were about two orders of magnitude more sensitive during the dawn.

4. Response to half hour light breaks during an otherwise short-day regimen suggests that the relative insensitivity at dusk is due to light-adaptation of the receptor pigment system during the white-light day. Greater insight into the ecology of photoperiodism will therefore probably be derived from action spectra based on the extended day technique than from those based on light breaks during the dark period.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
D.S. Koveos, A. Kroon, and A. Veerman
The Same Photoperiodic Clock May Control Induction and Maintenance of Diapause in the Spider Mite Tetranchus urticae
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 265 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.