Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Biol Bull 166: 310-327. (April 1984)
© 1984 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PURCELL, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PURCELL, J. E.

THE FUNCTIONS OF NEMATOCYSTS IN PREY CAPTURE BY EPIPELAGIC SIPHONOPHORES (COELENTERATA, HYDROZOA)

JENNIFER E. PURCELL 1

1 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543

The nematocysts of 24 siphonophore species were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for differences that could relate to differences in the sizes and types of prey captured. The siphonophore species in the suborder Calycophorae had 4-30 microbasic mastigophores (0.7-18.0 µl volume), and 50-2000 smaller homotrichous anisorhizas in uncoiled nematocyst batteries. The physonect siphonophore species had 4-120 stenoteles or microbasic mastigophores (1.8-40.7 µl volume), and 150-20,500 smaller homotrichous anisorhizas in coiled nematocyst batteries. The sizes of crustacean prey (primarily copepods) captured by species in both suborders increased with increasing nematocyst size and numbers. Examination by SEM of captured, but uningested prey showed that the heavily-spined threads of these nematocysts adhered to the prey surface, and primarily entangled the prey. In contrast, the tentacles of siphonophores in the suborder Cystonectae, which includes Physalia physalis, have only isorhizas of 1.0-18.0 µl volume with and without small spines on the threads. These nematocysts penetrate the soft-bodied prey (mostly fish larvae) of these siphonophores, but apparently do not penetrate or entangle hard-bodied prey. Thus prey capture by siphonophores differs with the sizes, numbers, and types of nematocysts present in each species. The possible functions of nematocyst batteries in tentacle spreading, and luring of large zooplankton prey are discussed.

Submitted on August 24, 1983
Accepted on January 18, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. Bouchard, R. B. Price, C. G. Moneypenny, L. F. Thompson, M. Zillhardt, L. Stalheim, and P. A. V. Anderson
Cloning and functional expression of voltage-gated ion channel subunits from cnidocytes of the Portuguese Man O'War Physalia physalis
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2979 - 2989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
L. Francis
Microscaling: Why Larger Anemones Have Longer Cnidae
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2004; 207(2): 116 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.