Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 167: 390-409. (October 1984)
© 1984 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEST, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by WINSTON, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BEST, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by WINSTON, J. E.

SKELETAL STRENGTH OF ENCRUSTING CHEILOSTOME BRYOZOANS

BARBARA A. BEST 1 and JUDITH E. WINSTON 2

1 Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706
2 Department of Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024

Encrusting cheilostome bryozoans structurally resemble aggregates of small boxes, with both frontal and vertical walls capable of resisting forces generated by water-borne debris or predators. Both the skeletal strength and design of the walls are important in determining the relative ability of the colony to resist damage. Two mechanical tests, puncture and compression, performed on nine species of tropical bryozoans reveal significant differences in skeletal strength both between species and between the outer and inner regions of colonies. Puncture stresses required to break through the frontal walls of zooids range from 0.8 to 291.0 MNm-2 for edge zooids and from 1.1 to 457.4 MNm-2 for inner zooids; compressive stresses required to damage the colony range from 4.4 to 16.9 MNm-2 for edge regions and 6.5 to 27.2 MNm-2 for inner regions. Ecological implications for these differences in skeletal strength are discussed with particular reference to resisting predation. From the mechanical test results, the material properties of shear strength (2.6-90.5 MNm-2) and compressive strength (8.2-110.0 MNm-2) are estimated for the frontal and vertical walls, respectively. Bryozoan wall material appears to be comparable in strength to such biological ceramics as coral, echinoid spine, bivalve shell, and vertebrate bone, but lower in strength than gastropod shell.

Submitted on April 19, 1984
Accepted on July 13, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. B. C. JACKSON and K. W. KAUFMANN
Diadema antillarum Was Not a Keystone Predator in Cryptic Reef Environments
Science, February 6, 1987; 235(4789): 687 - 689.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.