Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 168: 35-43. (June 1985)
© 1985 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MONROY, A.
Right arrow Articles by GROEBEN, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MONROY, A.
Right arrow Articles by GROEBEN, C.

THE "NEW" EMBRYOLOGY AT THE ZOOLOGICAL STATION AND AT THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY

ALBERTO MONROY 1 and CHRISTIANE GROEBEN 1

1 Stazione Zoologica, 80121 Napoli, Italy

The Naples Zoological Station was one of the main centers of the revolt against Haeckelian, phylogenetic embryology. On the other hand, the founder of the Station, Anton Dohrn, while being a distinguished embryologist, was an enthusiastic follower of Haeckel's theories. The question discussed here first is that of the interactions between Dohrn and the followers of the new trend in embryology, the Entwicklungs-mechaniker, among whom Herbst, Driesch, and Boveri were regular visitors to the Station. While Dohrn fully acknowledged the significance of the discoveries arising from the new experimental approach to embryology, he remained faithful to phylogenetic embryology. Examining the interactions between two American biologists most involved in the foundation of the MBL, namely C. O. Whitman and E. B. Wilson, and the leaders of the "new" embryology, we then discuss the effect of these interactions on the development of embryological research at the MBL. We suggest that the main effect was to promote the new conceptual, and hence methodological, approach to the problems of development. The Naples group saw the egg as a cell that could be manipulated in an effort to answer questions concerning cell physiology. In contrast, the Woods Hole group was interested in the egg as the starting point of development. This was reflected also in the choice of the experimental material: the sea urchin egg in the former case and the highly "determined" eggs of mollusks and annelids in the latter.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.