Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 169: 675-688. (December 1985)
© 1985 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by HERMANS, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by HERMANS, C. O.

ADHESIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE TUBE FEET OF A STARFISH, LEPTASTERIAS HEXACTIS, AND SUBSTRATA

LINDA A. THOMAS 1 and COLIN O. HERMANS 1

1 Department of Biology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California 94928

The tube feet of Leptasterias hexactis adhere to and release from substrata by chemical interactions. In our laboratory these podia adhered to substrata coated with the ubiquetous anionic saccharide films produced by marine bacteria. Podia also attached to moderately anionic glass, but not to uncharged surfaces. The adhesive epithelia of tube feet labeled heavily with ruthenium red, indicating they were anionic. Tube feet secreted footprint films that bound crystal violet, a cationic dye. Trypsin removed the films. Adhesion to marine surfaces was prevented by 300 units/ml of heparin, a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) that may have competitively inhibited the glue from binding exosaccharide marine films. Lectins that bind bacterial exosaccharides did not inhibit attachment. We propose that tube-foot attachments are nonspecific ionic interactions established by secreted proteinaceous films and released when secreted GAG's compete with the tube-foot epithelium for sites on the film. This system agrees with the duo-gland model for adhesion and deadhesion.

Submitted on June 13, 1985
Accepted on September 25, 1985




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Santos, S. Gorb, V. Jamar, and P. Flammang
Adhesion of echinoderm tube feet to rough surfaces
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2555 - 2567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. M. Smith
The Structure and Function of Adhesive Gels from Invertebrates
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1164 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. S. Vickery and J. B. McClintock
Comparative Morphology of Tube Feet Among the Asteroidea: Phylogenetic Implications
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2000; 40(3): 355 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.