Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 171: 197-207. (August 1986)
© 1986 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TELFORD, M.
Right arrow Articles by MOOI, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TELFORD, M.
Right arrow Articles by MOOI, R.

RESOURCE PARTITIONING BY SAND DOLLARS IN CARBONATE AND SILICEOUS SEDIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM PODIAL AND PARTICLE DIMENSIONS

MALCOLM TELFORD 1 and RICH MOOI 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1

The sand dollars, Leodia sexiesperforata (Leske) and Encope michelini L. Agassiz, have overlapping geographical ranges and may co-occur in mixed flocks. Leodia is restricted entirely to biogenic carbonate sediments. Mellita quinquiesperforata (Leske), which has a similar geographical range to Leodia, occurs only on siliceous terrigenous substrates and the two species never co-exist. Encope michelini L. Agassiz occurs on both types of substrate. All three species are podial particle pickers, and use barrel-tipped podia, especially the long type surrounding the geniculate spine fields of the oral surface, for food collection. A typical mellitid of 100 mm diameter can have up to one million barrel-tipped podia. These podia have the same mean diameters in Leodia (71.6 ± 5.62 µm) and Mellita (71.8 ± 3.59 µm). The diversity of sizes is significantly greater in Leodia. The barrel-tipped podia of E. michelini are very much larger (104.4 ± 11.1 µm). The substrates inhabited by the three species have approximately 90% of their particles in the 100-400 µm range. Whereas Mellita is nonselective in collecting food particles, Leodia clearly selects small particles (50-200 µm) and shuns those above 200 µm. Encope michelini includes 26% of particles over 200 µm in its food grooves, but does not take those below 100 µm. Differences in feeding behavior thus provide a basis for resource partitioning between these sympatric species. They are discussed in relation to podial dimensions and spination, and compared with feeding behavior in Mellita quinquiesperforata.

Submitted on March 13, 1986
Accepted on May 14, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
A NEW SPECIES OF LEODIA (CLYPEASTEROIDA: ECHINOIDEA) FROM THE NEOGENE OF VENEZUELA AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN THE PHYLOGENY OF MELLITID SAND DOLLARS
Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2000; 74(6): 1083 - 1092.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.