Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 172: 89-107. (February 1987)
© 1987 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by LOBEL, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by LOBEL, P. S.

THE CONTINUING ENIGMA OF CIGUATERA

DONALD M. ANDERSON 1 and PHILLIP S. LOBEL 1

1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543

Research on ciguatera fish poisoning has expanded significantly over the last decade. In large part, this increase in effort is due to the identification of several benthic dinoflagellates as the toxin producers, a discovery soon followed by a series of field and laboratory studies on their distribution, abundance, growth characteristics, and toxin production. Equally important have been advances in the analytical techniques and equipment needed to chemically characterize the toxins. Much of that work benefited significantly from the rapid progress in chemical research on the numerous other toxins produced by marine dinoflagellates.

Despite this surge in activity (summarized in the proceedings of four recent conferences or workshops: Ragelis, 1984; Salvat, 1985; Anderson et al., 1985; this issue), the general state of knowledge on ciguatera remains relatively poor, both in terms of toxin chemistry and the physiological ecology of the causative dinoflagellates. Some important generalizations are gaining acceptance, but discrepancies and disagreements abound. One of the objectives of this review is to place the many recent papers on ciguatera in a current perspective that not only identifies common observations or conclusions, but also accentuates those areas that require more research effort to resolve disagreements or contradictions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. D. Hackett, D. M. Anderson, D. L. Erdner, and D. Bhattacharya
Dinoflagellates: a remarkable evolutionary experiment
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1523 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.