Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Biol Bull 174: 163-171. (April 1988)
© 1988 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THORINGTON, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by HESSINGER, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by THORINGTON, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by HESSINGER, D. A.

Control of Cnida Discharge: I. Evidence for Two Classes of Chemoreceptor

GLYNE U. THORINGTON 1 and DAVID A. HESSINGER 1

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350

Appropriate chemical stimulation of cnidocytes along with mechanical stimulation is required to trigger discharge of cnidae. It has been generally assumed that such chemosensitization is mediated via specific chemoreceptors. Such chemoreceptors and their complementary ligands have never been identified. We now identify two groups of naturally occurring substances that chemosensitize cnida discharge in the feeding tentades of the sea anemone, Aiptasia pallida. In addition, using a novel technique to quantify cnida discharge we demonstrate that these chemosensitizers act through at least two distinct classes of receptors. One class is broadly specific toward a variety of amino and imino acids and histamine (K0.5 = 11-30 nM), but is competitively inhibited by antihistamines (Ki = 0.1-7.4 µM). A second class is specific for N-acetylated sugars (K0.5 = 0.1-1.5 µM), but not affected by antihistamines. Presumably, these chemoreceptors detect specific substances from potential prey. Thus, cnidocytes are sensitized to discharge their cnidae in response to mechanical stimuli originating from the prey.

Submitted on November 4, 1987
Accepted on January 25, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
P. G. Greenwood, K. Garry, A. Hunter, and M. Jennings
Adaptable Defense: A Nudibranch Mucus Inhibits Nematocyst Discharge and Changes With Prey Type
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2004; 206(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. H. Cohen and R. B. Forward Jr
Ctenophore kairomones and modified aminosugar disaccharides alter the shadow response in a larval crab
J. Plankton Res., February 1, 2003; 25(2): 203 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. H. Ozacmak, G. U. Thorington, W. H. Fletcher, and D. A. Hessinger
N-Acetylneuraminic Acid (NANA) Stimulates in situ cyclic AMP Production in Tentacles of Sea Anemone (Aiptasia pallida): Possible Role in Chemosensitization of Nematocyst Discharge
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 2011 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
G. Watson and D. Hessinger
Cnidocyte mechanoreceptors are tuned to the movements of swimming prey by chemoreceptors
Science, March 24, 1989; 243(4898): 1589 - 1591.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.