Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 175: 79-93. (August 1988)
© 1988 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMILEY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SMILEY, S.

The Dynamics of Oogenesis and the Annual Ovarian Cycle of Stichopus californicus (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea)

SCOTT SMILEY 1

1 Friday Harbor Laboratories and Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

The major cytological stages of oogenesis in the holothurian Stichopus californicus are morphologically separated in distinct classes of tubules, the discrete anatomical units comprising the ovary. Primordial germ cells are in the connective tissue compartment of the gonad basis. Mitotic oogonia are in the smallest and most anterior set of primary ovarian tubules. Oocytes in the early prophase stages of meiosis I are in secondary tubules located more posteriorly. Diplotene oocytes occur in larger, more posterior secondary tubules. The most advanced oocytes are in the most posterior fecund tubules. S. californicus oocytes bear nuage, a subcellular marker common to many germ line cells. The striking axial polarization of these oocytes, evident as the egg axis, is indistinguishable from the apical basal axial polarization in epithelial germ line cells. These axes are congruent throughout the developmental history of the oocyte. I present a model for the annual cycle of the S. californicus ovary and assess its application to other holothurians. I infer function from the structure of oogenesis presented here; and contrast this information with what is known about oogenesis in the other echinoderm classes.

Submitted on December 8, 1987
Accepted on April 15, 1988







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.