Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 176: 218-228. (June 1989)
© 1989 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOTT, J.
Right arrow Articles by COOK, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOTT, J.
Right arrow Articles by COOK, C. B.

Diel Variation in Prey Capture Behavior by the Corallimorpharian Discosoma sanctithomae: Mechanical and Chemical Activation of Feeding

JOEL ELLIOTT 1 and CLAYTON B. COOK 2

1 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
2 Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Inc., 17 Biological Lane, Ferry Reach, Bermuda GE 01

The feeding biology of corallimorpharians is poorly understood. This paper describes an envelopment method of prey capture by a Caribbean species, Discosoma (= Rhodactis) sanctithomae, and further examines the stimuli that elicit envelopment and subsequent ingestion of prey. The corallimorpharians exhibited a diel pattern of expansion and contraction of the oral disc margin and tentacles. This was correlated with the density of zooxanthellae in these tissues. The tentacles expanded during the day to expose abundant zooxanthellae. The oral disc margin contained relatively few zooxanthellae and was contracted and turned down in a convex posture during the day. At night the margin was expanded and turned up to give the oral disc a bowl-shaped posture. This allowed effective execution of the envelopment response that was successful in the capture of crustaceans, polychaetes, and small fishes that were most abundant in the plankton at night. The stimuli that elicited this predatory behavior were both mechanical and chemical. Mechanical stimulation elicited envelopment at night but was not as effective during the day. Envelopment was also activated by the imino acid proline and the tripeptide reduced glutathione at low concentrations, and four other amino acids at high concentrations. Continued contraction and ingestion responses required chemical activation. Consistent ingestion responses were caused only by reduced glutathione.

Submitted on October 26, 1988
Accepted on March 30, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A.A. Venn, J.E. Loram, and A.E. Douglas
Photosynthetic symbioses in animals
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(5): 1069 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.