Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorington, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by Hessinger, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thorington, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by Hessinger, D. A.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 178, Issue 1 74-83, Copyright © 1990 by Marine Biological Laboratory

PHYSIOLOGY

Control of Cnida Discharge: III. Spirocysts are Regulated by Three Classes of Chemoreceptors

G. U. Thorington and D. A. Hessinger
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350

Spirocysts are two to three times more abundant than nematocysts in the feeding tentacles of acontiate sea anemones. Despite their prevalence, little experimental work has been done on the discharge of spirocysts because of the difficulty in detecting and counting them after they have discharged. To circumvent this problem, we have developed a simple, reliable, enzyme-linked lectin sorbent assay (ELLSA) for quantifying discharged spirocysts. With this method, we have shown that the discharge of spirocysts, like that of mastigophore nematocysts, is chemosensitized in a dose-dependent manner by three classes of low molecular weight substances, typified by N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA), glycine, and certain heterocyclic amino compounds, such as proline and histamine. We also show that spirocysts exhibit considerable agonist-specific variation in the dose-responses of discharge, suggesting the existence of multiple populations of spirocyst-bearing cnidocyte/supporting cell complexes (CSCCs). Our findings call into question commonly held views regarding the respective roles of spirocysts and mastigophore nematocysts in the retention of captured prey.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
P. G. Greenwood, K. Garry, A. Hunter, and M. Jennings
Adaptable Defense: A Nudibranch Mucus Inhibits Nematocyst Discharge and Changes With Prey Type
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2004; 206(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. H. Ozacmak, G. U. Thorington, W. H. Fletcher, and D. A. Hessinger
N-Acetylneuraminic Acid (NANA) Stimulates in situ cyclic AMP Production in Tentacles of Sea Anemone (Aiptasia pallida): Possible Role in Chemosensitization of Nematocyst Discharge
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 2011 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.