Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, V. S.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 180, Issue 1 103-111, Copyright © 1991 by Marine Biological Laboratory

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION

Differential Ingestion and Digestion of Bivalve Larvae by the Scyphozoan Chrysaora quinquecirrha and the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi

J. E. Purcell, F. P. Cresswell, D. G. Cargo and V. S. Kennedy
The University of Maryland

We investigated predation on bivalve veligers by the scyphozoan Chrysaora quinquecirrha and the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. We found that the medusa stage of C. quinquecirrha captures, but does not digest, veliger larvae: 99% of oyster veligers (Crassostrea virginica) caught by medusae were egested alive within 7 h of capture, and 98% survived for 24 h after egestion; 98% of oyster, mussel (Mytilus edulis), and clam (Mulinia lateralis) veligers placed on the oral arms of medusae were rejected; all bivalve veligers in field-collected medusae were closed and full of tissue. Our laboratory evidence suggests that the shell of larval bivalves probably offers protection from medusae: 23% of dead, open veligers were ingested by medusae compared with 0.7% of live, closed veligers; open veligers were retained longer than closed veligers; and tissue excised from recently settled oyster larvae was ingested and digested. Freeswimming C. quinquecirrha ephyrae ingested but did not digest veligers. By contrast, the benthic scyphistoma stage ingested 69% of veligers that contacted their tentacles and digested 48% of those ingested. Each scyphistoma consumed an average of 1 veliger/day at densities of 0.3 veligers ml-1. However, larval settlement was not reduced on oyster shells bearing scyphistomae. By contrast to the results on C. quinquecirrha, ctenophores egested only 4% of veligers alive, and 25% of the veligers in their gut contents were digested. Predation on veligers by ctenophores was estimated to be 0.2 to 1.7%/day in Chesapeake Bay. We conclude that C. quinquecirrha medusae are not important predators of bivalve veligers, but rather may reduce their mortality by consuming ctenophores, which do eat veligers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. H. D. Haddock
Comparative feeding behavior of planktonic ctenophores
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 47(6): 847 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
R. Rapoza, D. Novak, and J. H. Costello
Life-stage dependent, in situ dietary patterns of the lobate ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi Agassiz 1865
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2005; 27(9): 951 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
W. M. Graham and R. M. Kroutil
Size-based Prey Selectivity and Dietary Shifts in the Jellyfish, Aurelia aurita
J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2001; 23(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
R. Waggett and J.H. Costello
Capture mechanisms used by the lobate ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, preying on the copepod Acartia tonsa
J. Plankton Res., November 1, 1999; 21(11): 2037 - 2052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.