Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hart, M. W.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 180, Issue 1 12-27, Copyright © 1991 by Marine Biological Laboratory

BEHAVIOR

Particle Captures and the Method of Suspension Feeding by Echinoderm Larvae

M. W. Hart
Department of Zoology, NJ-15, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195

Motivated by discrepancies between two recent descriptions of the suspension-feeding mechanism employed by echinoderm larvae, I describe particle captures by the larvae of seven species of temperate eastern Pacific echinoderms from four classes. When videotape recordings of free-swimming larvae clearing plastic spheres from suspension were analyzed, two modes of particle capture were observed to operate. The majority of captured spheres were caught at the peripheral ciliated band and then transported to the mouth, often by repeated capture on portions of the band progressively nearer to the mouth. This description is consistent with the ciliary reversal model of suspension feeding described by R. R. Strathmann. A small minority of captured spheres followed broad, curving paths directly into the larval mouth without interception at the ciliated band. These particle paths resemble those described by T. H. J. Gilmour. The videotape recordings also permitted a quantitative comparison of suspension feeding by these larvae. Several aspects of this behavior varied among developmental stages or among types of larvae, including: the distribution of particle captures among different segments of the ciliated band, the number of captures for single particles en route to the mouth, and the frequency of particles lost after initial capture. This variation raises a number of questions regarding the feeding performance of different larval species and the efficacy of these different larvae as elements of a reproductive strategy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
R. R. Strathmann
Time and Extent of Ciliary Response to Particles in a Non-Filtering Feeding Mechanism
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2007; 212(2): 93 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. R. Strathmann and D. Grunbaum
Good eaters, poor swimmers: compromises in larval form
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 46(3): 312 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
R. D. Podolsky and J. S. McAlister
Developmental Plasticity in Macrophiothrix Brittlestars: Are Morphologically Convergent Larvae Also Convergently Plastic?
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2005; 209(2): 127 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
R. D. Podolsky
Temperature and Water Viscosity: Physiological Versus Mechanical Effects on Suspension Feeding
Science, July 1, 1994; 265(5168): 100 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.