Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. Z.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 180, Issue 2 200-208, Copyright © 1991 by Marine Biological Laboratory

ARTICLES

Computation in the Learning System of Cephalopods

J. Z. Young
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom

The memory mechanisms of cephalopods consist of a series of matrices of intersecting axes, which find associations between the signals of input events and their consequences. The tactile memory is distributed among eight such matrices, and there is also some suboesophageal learning capacity. The visual memory lies in the optic lobe and four matrices, with some re-exciting pathways. In both systems, damage to any part reduces proportionally the effectiveness of the whole memory. These matrices are somewhat like those in mammals, for instance those in the hippocampus. The first matrix in both visual and tactile systems receives signals of vision and taste, and its output serves to increase the tendency to attack or to take with the arms. The second matrix provides for the correlation of groups of signals on its neurons, which pass signals to the third matrix. Here large cells find clusters in the sets of signals. Their output re-excites those of the first lobe, unless pain occurs. In that case, this set of cells provides a record that ensures retreat. There is experimental evidence that these distributed memory systems allow for the identification of categories of visual and tactile inputs, for generalization, and for decision on appropriate behavior in the light of experience. The evidence suggests that learning in cephalopods is not localized to certain layers or "grandmother cells" but is distributed with high redundance in serial networks, with recurrent circuits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
C. Jozet-Alves, J. Moderan, and L. Dickel
Sex differences in spatial cognition in an invertebrate: the cuttlefish
Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2008; 275(1646): 2049 - 2054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Crook and J. Basil
A biphasic memory curve in the chambered nautilus, Nautilus pompilius L. (Cephalopoda: Nautiloidea)
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1992 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
B. Hochner, T. Shomrat, and G. Fiorito
The Octopus: A Model for a Comparative Analysis of the Evolution of Learning and Memory Mechanisms
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2006; 210(3): 308 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T Preuss and W. Gilly
Role of prey-capture experience in the development of the escape response in the squid Loligo opalescens: a physiological correlate in an identified neuron
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 559 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
G. Fiorito and P. Scotto
Observational Learning in Octopus vulgaris
Science, April 24, 1992; 256(5056): 545 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.