The Biological Bulletin, Vol 180, Issue 3 416-431, Copyright © 1991 by Marine Biological Laboratory

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION

Autotomy in Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) Populations: Geographic, Temporal, and Ontogenetic Variation

L. D. Smith and A. H. Hines
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037

Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) populations were examined at four sites in Chesapeake Bay and three additional sites along the southeastern Atlantic coast and Gulf of Mexico; the aims were to assess the incidence of limb autotomy and to determine whether injury patterns varied temporally, geographically, and ontogenetically. These data, which include four years of information from one site (Rhode River, Maryland, a subestuary of central Chesapeake Bay), make this study the most extensive and intensive survey of limb autotomy yet conducted in arthropods. A substantial percentage (17-39%) of the blue crab populations were either missing or regenerating one or more limbs, suggesting that autotomy is an important mechanism for their survival. The frequency of limb autotomy varied, both within and between years, and over broad geographical scales. Injury levels were generally correlated positively with crab size. Limb autotomy was independent of sex and molt stage, and frequencies varied little among sites in the Rhode River. Patterns of limb injury in C. sapidus were remarkably consistent among all sites. The most frequent injury involved loss of a single cheliped. Swimming legs suffered the least damage. Severe multiple limb loss was rare. Right and left limbs were lost with equal frequency in most populations. This consistency of autotomy pattern suggests differential vulnerability of limbs and standard behavioral response by blue crabs to various injury-causing agents. The frequency of autotomy was density-dependent in the Rhode River, indicating that intraspecific interactions (e.g., cannibalism) may be a major cause of limb loss in populations in the Rhode River subestuary and elsewhere.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Maginnis The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 857 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]