|
|
||||||||
The Biological Bulletin, Vol 182, Issue 2 221-230, Copyright © 1992 by Marine Biological Laboratory
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION |
D. F. Shapiro
Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853
This paper describes a mixed allorecognition interaction between adjoining colonies of the encrusting cheilostome bryozoan Membranipora membranacea, in which characteristics of both intercolony fusion and intercolony rejection occur simultaneously. Intercolony coordination of zooid behavior was assayed by applying electrical stimuli to one colony of a colony pair while observing the behavior of the adjoining colony. Retraction of feeding structures (lophophores) by the unstimulated colony indicated intercolony coordination of behavior. Naturally occurring and artificially created pairs of genotypically identical and genotypically distinct colonies were examined. Additionally, colony borders were examined for the presence of pore plates, structures that physiologically link zooids within colonies. Contact between genetically identical colonies (isocontact) always resulted in a characteristic border morphology, characteristic pore plates, and intercolony coordination of zooid behavior. Contact between genotypically distinct colonies (allocontact) always resulted in a characteristic border morphology and in the formation of characteristic pore plates of a type never before described. However, only colonies that were young when they first came into contact showed coordinated behavior. Intercolony coordination of zooid behavior is probably the result of neural connections made through pore plates. Intercolony behavioral coordination between young genotypically distinct colonies is peculiar, because the colonies simultaneously show characteristics of physiological integration (coordinated behavior) and tissue rejection (borders and pore plates characteristic of contact between genetically distinct tissues). This interaction shows that the presence of the morphological characteristics of intercolony rejection does not always imply a lack of physiological integration between colonies.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |