Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Soong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, J. C.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 183, Issue 3 418-431, Copyright © 1992 by Marine Biological Laboratory


DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION

Reproductive Integration in Reef Corals

K. Soong and J. C. Lang
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712

The extent of colonial integration in structurally simple animals like scleractinian corals is poorly understood. We have used sexual reproductive characters (location of fertile polyps and colony size at maturation) to assess colony-level individuality, i.e., the development, in coral colonies, of characters above the polyp level. Ten morphologically-diverse species of reef corals were used: Acropora cervicornis, A. palmata, Diploria clivosa, D. strigosa, Favia fragum, Montastrea cavernosa, Porites astreoides, P. furcata, Siderastrea radians, and S. siderea. In no species were equally fertile polyps homogeneously distributed throughout a colony. Most inhomogeneities of fertile polyps could be attributed to intra-colony position or ontogenetic effects. The results of simple manipulations simulating natural wounds in three massive species strengthen the evidence that the position of polyps within a colony determines fertility. Small colonies are not reproductive. Puberty size (colony size at maturation) could be explained by the infertility pattern along the colony margin, which does not require colony-level integration. Shape-related growth constraints could also produce the puberty size patterns found in massive corals. Infertility in the short radial polyps of A. palmata and in the axial polyps of A. cervicornis provided the only clear evidence of reproductive integration in this study: both are related to a morphological characteristic (polyp dimorphism) commonly associated with integration in colonial invertebrates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. Elahi and P. J. Edmunds
Tissue Age Affects Calcification in the Scleractinian Coral Madracis mirabilis
Biol. Bull., February 1, 2007; 212(1): 20 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. Brickner, U. Oren, U. Frank, and Y. Loya
Energy integration between the solitary polyps of the clonal coral Lobophyllia corymbosa
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1690 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Knowlton
The future of coral reefs
PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5419 - 5425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.