Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drewes, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fourtner, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Drewes, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fourtner, C. R.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 185, Issue 1 1-9, Copyright © 1993 by Marine Biological Laboratory


BEHAVIOR AND BIOMECHANICS

Helical Swimming in a Freshwater Oligochaete

C. D. Drewes and C. R. Fourtner
Department of Zoology and Genetics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011

A novel pattern of undulatory swimming is described in the freshwater oligochaete, Dero digitata (Family Naididae). Movements are rhythmic (6-12 cycles/s), each cycle consisting of a single, helical body wave that passes from the worm's anterior to posterior end, thus propelling the worm forward. Successive cycles of these waves alternate between right-handed and left-handed helical orientations. Helical swimming in response to posterior tactile stimulation was commonly expressed in all stages of asexual reproduction, including non-fissioning "normal" worms, late prefission worms, and separated anterior or posterior zooids. Swimming also occurred in amputated anterior and posterior body fragments. Reynolds numbers ranged from approximately 50 (in the shortest and slowest worms) to 300 (in the longest and fastest worms). During slow swimming, wave velocities and forward velocities were 37 mm/s and 10 mm/s, respectively; during fast swimming these values were 55 mm/s and 25 mm/s, respectively. Thus, corresponding values of overall "slippage" were 73 and 55%, respectively. Central conduction of swim wave excitation likely involves intersegmental, non-giant fiber pathways that are (1) functionally coupled between anterior and posterior zooids of prefission worms and (2) readily activated by posterior mechanosensory inputs in whole worms and isolated zooids.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.