Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jokiel, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bigger, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jokiel, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bigger, C. H.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 186, Issue 1 72-80, Copyright © 1994 by Marine Biological Laboratory


DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION

Aspects of Histocompatibility and Regeneration in the Solitary Reef Coral Fungia scutaria

P. L. Jokiel and C. H. Bigger
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 1346, Kaneohe, Hawaii 96744

Discoid coralla of the solitary free-living reef coral Fungia scutaria were cut with a rock saw and rejoined in various paired combinations and orientations of autogeneic sections (self to self), isogeneic sections (clone-mate to clone-mate), and allogeneic sections (two different genotypes). Results of these experiments provide the first evidence of histocompatibility in a solitary coral. Autogeneic or isogeneic sections of coralla with one section containing a mouth were joined along cut edges. In all cases, fusion of tissues occurred within weeks, followed by skeletal fusion within months. However, autogeneic or isogeneic sections rejoined along the uncut edges did not fuse. Isogeneic pairings between two sections with mouths produced neither tissue/skeletal fusion nor cytotoxicity at the interface. Individual cut sections were allowed to regenerate. Sections containing the parent mouth did not develop new mouths. However, cut sections lacking a mouth always regenerated multiple mouths along the cut edge, but not along the uncut edge. Sections without mouths cut along a second line parallel to the first cut always regenerated mouths along the cut edge located closest to what had been the mouth area of the original corallum. The new mouths eventually developed into individual polyps.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. Brickner, U. Oren, U. Frank, and Y. Loya
Energy integration between the solitary polyps of the clonal coral Lobophyllia corymbosa
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1690 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.