Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, I. C.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 190, Issue 2 237-242, Copyright © 1996 by Marine Biological Laboratory

VIEWS AND DISCUSSION

Mutable Collagenous Structure or Not? A Comment on the Re-interpretation by del Castillo et al. of the Catch Mechanism in the Sea Urchin Spine Ligament

I. C. Wilkie
Department of Biological Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, Scotland

It is now widely recognized that one of the characteristic features of the phylum Echinodermata is the presence of collagenous tissues that can undergo rapid, nervously mediated changes in mechanical properties (1,2). Whilst examples of such mutable collagenous tissues have been demonstrated in the five major echinoderm classes (3,4), research over the past 30 years has focused on a certain few of them that are easily accessible and amenable to experimental investigation. The capsular ligament ("catch apparatus"--CA) of the echinoid spine-test joint is one of these well-studied collagenous structures. Because the CA can undergo reversible changes in passive stifness, it was believed to be a catch muscle by von Uexkull (5). Subsequently it was shown to consist predominantly of collagenous connective tissue with only a scattering of small muscle fibers. Analysis of its mechanical properties and physiological responses led most workers to the conclusion that the CA is a posture-locking device whose functioning depends almost entirely on the variable tensility of its extracellular connective tissue (6-11). However, de1 Castillo et al. (12) have presented a model in which its catch properties are attributed only to the contractile cells and in which connective tissue mutability plays no role. The aims of this contribution are to evaluate the new model, to show that it cannot explain the behavior of the CA, and to demonstrate that the extracellular matrix must be the primary source of the catch properties of the CA.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
N. Takemae and T. Motokawa
Mechanical Properties of the Isolated Catch Apparatus of the Sea Urchin Spine Joint: Muscle Fibers Do Not Contribute to Passive Stiffness Changes
Biol. Bull., February 1, 2005; 208(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. C. Wilkie
Is muscle involved in the mechanical adaptability of echinoderm mutable collagenous tissue?
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 159 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Cluzel, C. Lethias, F. Humbert, R. Garrone, and J.-Y. Exposito
Characterization of Fibrosurfin, an Interfibrillar Component of Sea Urchin Catch Connective Tissues
J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2001; 276(21): 18108 - 18114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.