Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, S. W.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 190, Issue 2 252-259, Copyright © 1996 by Marine Biological Laboratory

NAML WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS

Regional Coastal Research--What Is It? Why Do It? What Role Should NAML Play?

S. W. Nixon
Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Campus, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882-1197

Regional coastal (i.e., marine and Great Lakes) research is an increasingly popular, but still illdefined, activity. The purpose of regional research and monitoring is to help us understand how events and processes at higher levels of organization, over larger spaces and longer times, influence local ecosystems of interest or concern. Research at this scale will require us to work in larger multidisciplinary and multi-institutional teams than we traditionally have. A survey of papers published in Estuaries, Continental Shelf Research, and Deep Sea Research confirms the impression that estuarine studies are more commonly carried out by one or two investigators, and that those investigators are commonly from a single institution. However, the most important challenge facing coastal ecologists as they embark on largerscale research lies, not in increasing collaboration, but in their traditional approach to science. We marine ecologists too often indulge in elaborate post hoc explanations for the behavior of the complex systems we study, rather than focusing on the development and testing of falsifiable empirical theories. Moreover, we tend to describe our research priorities and accomplishments using fuzzy terms and concepts that seldom have clear operational definitions. As a result, we are in danger of losing the confidence and support of the public and the science funding agencies. It will not do to embark on regional research by simply trying to measure more things in more places more often. The coastal marine research community, perhaps through the National Association of Marine Laboratories (NAML), must reexamine the way it has been doing research. We will have to do smarter science if we are going to prosper in a future of diminished resources.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.