Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mokady, O.
Right arrow Articles by Loya, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mokady, O.
Right arrow Articles by Loya, Y.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 190, Issue 3 367-372, Copyright © 1996 by Marine Biological Laboratory

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION

Echinoid Bioerosion as a Major Structuring Force of Red Sea Coral Reefs

O. Mokady, B. Lazar and Y. Loya
The Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Echinoid bioerosion is ecologically important as a limiting factor for reef growth. Diadema setosum and Echinometra mathaei are the most abundant sea urchins in the Gulf of Eilat, Red Sea. Bioerosion by these urchins was estimated from field experiments with urchins placed in underwater chambers. A novel methodology was developed for measuring the CaCO3 content of fecal pellets and total gut contents. This method is based on measurement of the amount of gas formed by total acidification of a mixed sample. The population density of the urchins was determined for the reef flat (depth 0.6-1 m) and the reef slope (depth 6-8 m). D. setosum, which erodes 310 mg individual-1 d-1, is much less abundant on the reef flat (0.1 individuals m-2) than on the reef slope (6.4 individuals m-2). In contrast, E. mathaei, which erodes 120 mg individual-1 d-1, is more dominant on the reef flat (10.5 individuals m-2) than on the reef slope (3.7 individuals m--2). We estimate that echinoid bioerosion converts to carbonate sediments 7%-11% of the total reef flat calcification and 13%-22% of the total reef slope calcification. These findings emphasize the importance of echinoid bioerosion as a structuring force in the coral reef, and its potential importance to the dynamics of reef development. However, they imply that some previous studies may have overestimated the role of echinoid bioerosion, thus possibly underestimating internal bioerosion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Zundelevich, B. Lazar, and M. Ilan
Chemical versus mechanical bioerosion of coral reefs by boring sponges - lessons from Pione cf. vastifica
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Minic and G. Herve
Arginine Metabolism in the Deep Sea Tube Worm Riftia pachyptila and Its Bacterial Endosymbiont
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40527 - 40533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PALAIOSHome page
Mollusc Shell Encrustation and Bioerosion Rates in a Modern Epeiric Sea: Taphonomy Experiments in the Java Sea, Indonesia
Palaios, April 1, 2002; 17(2): 171 - 191.


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Lee, J. Robinson, and C. Cavanaugh
Pathways of inorganic nitrogen assimilation in chemoautotrophic bacteria-marine invertebrate symbioses: expression of host and symbiont glutamine synthetase
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 1999; 202(3): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.