|
|
||||||||
The Biological Bulletin, Vol 191, Issue 1 103-108, Copyright © 1996 by Marine Biological Laboratory
FINDING FOOD: NEUROETHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF FORAGING |
M. Kawasaki
University of Virginia, Department of Biology, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
African wave-type electric fish, Gymnarchus, and South American wave-type electric fish, Eigenmannia, have evolved electrosensory and electromotor systems independently. Nevertheless, they exhibit a similar electrical behavior, the jamming avoidance response (JAR). When two individuals with slightly different frequencies of electric organ discharge (EOD) meet, they shift discharge frequencies away from each other to avoid mutual jamming of their electrolocation systems. These two genera of electric fishes perform this behavior using an identical set of complex computational rules. Reflecting their independent evolution, however, neuronal implementation of the computational steps appears to take different forms. One of the essential computational steps, phase comparison, is performed in the hindbrain in Gymnarchus and in the midbrain in Eigenmannia. The comparison of these two species in this paper revealed an example of how different brain structures perform functionally similar tasks in independently evolved systems that have a similar overall behavioral function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kawasaki and Y.-X. Guo Parallel Projection of Amplitude and Phase Information from the Hindbrain to the Midbrain of the African Electric Fish Gymnarchus niloticus J. Neurosci., September 15, 1998; 18(18): 7599 - 7611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-X. Guo and M. Kawasaki Representation of Accurate Temporal Information in the Electrosensory System of the African Electric Fish, Gymnarchus niloticus J. Neurosci., March 1, 1997; 17(5): 1761 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |