Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Read, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Govind, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Read, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Govind, C. K.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 193, Issue 3 401-409, Copyright © 1997 by Marine Biological Laboratory

REGENERATION

Claw Transformation and Regeneration in Adult Snapping Shrimp: Test of the Inhibition Hypothesis for Maintaining Bilateral Asymmetry

A. T. Read and C. K. Govind
Life Sciences Division, University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada M1C 1A4

In the paired asymmetric claws of adult snapping shrimp, Alpheus heterochelis, the minor, or pincer, claw may transform into a major, or snapper, claw if the existing snapper claw is damaged or lost, implying that an intact snapper claw normally inhibits the contralateral pincer claw from advancing to a snapper. We find that the pincer-to-snapper advancement in external form occurs almost immediately after the snapper is lost even as late as the premolt stage. The transforming claw in turn inhibits the newly regenerating pincer claw from becoming a snapper, but if the dactyl of the transforming claw is cut, then snapper-based inhibition is removed and the contralateral claw may regenerate as a snapper, resulting in shrimp with paired snapper claws. However, damaging an established snapper claw will not allow another snapper claw to regenerate at the pincer site, implying that less inhibition is required to restrict a newly regenerating claw to a pincer than to arrest an existing pincer claw. Inhibition may be manifested largely in terms of quantity of innervation. Hence the greater innervation of the snapper side over the pincer side would inhibit the pincer side, accounting for the regeneration of paired claws in their previous configuration following loss of both claws. Loss of the paired claws in two consecutive molts retards their development so that both claws often appear as pincers, but in succeeding molts one usually differentiates into a snapper and bilateral asymmetry is restored. In contrast, shrimp with paired snapper claws retain this configuration over several molts unless one or both of the claws are lost; in that case, regeneration restores bilateral asymmetry. Thus, bilateral asymmetry of the paired claws of adult shrimp is governed by a strong intrinsic lateralizing mechanism in which the snapper claw inhibits the pincer from advancing to another snapper.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.