Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinkevich, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Yakir, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rinkevich, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Yakir, R.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 197, Issue 1 11-13, Copyright © 1999 by Marine Biological Laboratory


RESEARCH NOTES

Regeneration of Amputated Avian Bone by a Coral Skeletal Implant

B. Rinkevich, S. Ben-Yakir and R. Ben-Yakir
National Institute of Oceanography, Tel Shikmona, P.O.B. 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel

Bone fractures are common in both wild and captive birds (1, 2). Avian bones are thin and brittle and tend to break into fragments or shatter upon a variety of natural events (midair collisions, fights with other animals; ref. 2) or anthropogenic experiences (wounding by gunfire, collisions with cars or fences, encounters with traps, attacks by dogs or cats, etc.; ref. 1). The prospect of full recovery following repair of avian bone fracture is often poor, and the complication rate is high (3). For wild birds, anything less than complete normal function cannot be regarded as successful, and slight malunion or a change in a few degrees of rotation can produce a severe loss of flight function (4). Furthermore, in nomadic species, time is critical because long periods of rehabilitation may prevent the birds from reuniting with their flocks. In experiments with implantation of fragments of skeleton from the coral Stylophora pistillata, we found the implants to be avian osteo-conductive biomaterial, acting as a scaffold for a direct osteoblastic deposition. In the case study presented here, the bird regained complete flight activity within 2 weeks after surgery, with full regeneration of the amputated ulna.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.