Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bushmann, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bushmann, P. J.

The Biological Bulletin, Vol 197, Issue 1 63-71, Copyright © 1999 by Marine Biological Laboratory

NEUROBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR

Concurrent Signals and Behavioral Plasticity in Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) Courtship

P. J. Bushmann
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contee's Wharf Road, Edgewater, Maryland 21037

Behavioral flexibility and behavioral regulation through courtship signals may both contribute to mating success. Blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) form precopulatory pairs after courtship periods that are influenced by female and perhaps male urine-based chemical signals. In this study, male and female crabs were observed in 1.5-m circular outdoor pools for 45 min while the occurrence and sequence of courtship behaviors and pairing outcomes were recorded. These results were then compared with trials in which males or females were blindfolded; lateral antennule (outer flagellum) ablated; blindfolded and lateral antennule ablated; or had received nephropore blocks. The relative importance of visual and chemical sensory systems during blue crab courtship were then determined and urine and non-urine based chemical signals for both males and females were examined. Courtship behaviors varied considerably in occurrence and sequence; no measured behavior was necessary for pairing success. Male or female blindfolding had no effect on any measured behavior. Males and females required chemical information for normal courtship behaviors, yet blocking male or female urine release did not affect courtship behaviors. Males required chemical information to initiate pairing or to maintain stable pairs. Male urine release was necessary for stable pairing, suggesting that male urine signals may be involved in pair maintenance rather than pair formation. Females that could not receive chemical information paired faster and elicited fewer male agonistic behaviors. The results demonstrate a great variability and flexibility in blue crab courtship, with no evidence for stereotyped behavioral sequences. However, these behaviors appear regulated by urine- and nonurine-based redundant chemical signals emanating from both males and females. Although urine-based signals play roles in blue crab courtship, chemical signals from other sites appear to carry sufficient information to elicit a full range of behavioral responses in males and females.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Kamio, M. A. Reidenbach, and C. D. Derby
To paddle or not: context dependent courtship display by male blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1243 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
A. J. Horner, S. P. Nickles, M. J. Weissburg, and C. D. Derby
Source and Specificity of Chemical Cues Mediating Shelter Preference of Caribbean Spiny Lobsters (Panulirus argus).
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2006; 211(2): 128 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
E. R. Diaz and M. Thiel
Chemical and Visual Communication During Mate Searching in Rock Shrimp
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2004; 206(3): 134 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.