HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Etnier, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Etnier, S. A. Related Collections Biomechanics Crustaceans

Flexural and Torsional Stiffness in Multi-Jointed Biological Beams

Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338

Flexibility, the ability to deform in response to loads, is a common property of biological beams. This paper investigates the mechanical behavior of multi-jointed beams, which are characterized by a linear series of morphologically similar joints. Flexural stiffness and torsional stiffness were measured in two structurally distinct beams, crinoid arms (Echinodermata, Comatulida) and crustacean antennae (Arthropoda, Decapoda). Morphological data from these beams were used to determine the relative contributions of beam diameter and joint density (number of joints per millimeter of beam length) to the flexural and torsional stiffness of these two structures. As predicted by beam theory, beam diameter influenced stiffness in both crinoid arms and crustacean antennae. In crinoid arms, increases in joint density were associated with decreases in stiffness, but joint density had no significant influence on stiffness in crustacean antennae. In both crinoid arms and crustacean antennae, the magnitudes of flexural and torsional stiffness, as well as the ratio of these two variables, were similar to previously reported values for non-jointed biological beams. These results suggest that the structural design of a biological beam is not a limiting factor determining its mechanical properties.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. A. Mooney, W. W. L. Au, P. E. Nachtigall, and E. A. Trippel Acoustic and stiffness properties of gillnets as they relate to small cetacean bycatch ICES J. Mar. Sci., October 1, 2007; 64(7): 1324 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Etnier and P. J. Villani Differences in mechanical and structural properties of surface and aerial petioles of the aquatic plant Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa (Nymphaeaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1067 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Flynn and J. Ma Theoretical Analysis of Twist/Bend Ratio and Mechanical Moduli of Bacterial Flagellar Hook and Filament Biophys. J., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 3204 - 3210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Etnier Twisting and Bending of Biological Beams: Distribution of Biological Beams in a Stiffness Mechanospace Biol. Bull., August 1, 2003; 205(1): 36 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]