HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Levy, O. Articles by Achituv, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Levy, O. Articles by Achituv, Y. Related Collections Ecology Physiology Cnidarians

Factors Controlling the Expansion Behavior of Favia favus (Cnidaria: Scleractinia): Effects of Light, Flow, and Planktonic Prey

Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: levysher{at}netvision.net.il.

Colonies of the massive stony coral Favia favus were exposed to different flow speeds and levels of light, and to the addition of zooplankton prey. The relative importance of each factor in controlling polyp expansion behavior was tested. The coral polyps fully expanded when they were exposed to low light intensity (0–40 µmol m^-2 s^-1) and high flow speed (15 cm s^-1), regardless of prey presence. They also partially expanded under low and medium light (40–80 µmol m^-2 s^-1) at medium flow speed (10 cm s^-1). The corals expanded their polyps only when they were exposed to light levels below compensation irradiance (I_com: light level at which photosynthesis = respiration), which was determined to be about 107 ± 24 µmol m^-2 s^-1.

The results presented here indicate that high flow, low light, and the presence of planktonic prey induce coral expansion. There is a hierarchy of response to these stimuli, in which light level and flow speed are dominant over prey presence. Coral response to these three factors is probably due to the relative importance of gas exchange and zooplankton prey.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Neulinger, J. Jarnegren, M. Ludvigsen, K. Lochte, and W.-C. Dullo Phenotype-Specific Bacterial Communities in the Cold-Water Coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia) and Their Implications for the Coral's Nutrition, Health, and Distribution Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 74(23): 7272 - 7285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Furla, D. Allemand, J. M. Shick, C. Ferrier-Pages, S. Richier, A. Plantivaux, P.-L. Merle, and S. Tambutte The Symbiotic Anthozoan: A Physiological Chimera between Alga and Animal Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 45(4): 595 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Levy, Z. Dubinsky, and Y. Achituv Photobehavior of stony corals: responses to light spectra and intensity J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 4041 - 4049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Fingerut, C. A. Zimmer, and R. K. Zimmer Patterns and Processes of Larval Emergence in an Estuarine Parasite System Biol. Bull., October 1, 2003; 205(2): 110 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]