HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Birmingham, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Birmingham, J. T. Related Collections Neuroscience Crustaceans

Increasing Sensor Flexibility Through Neuromodulation

Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110

Both biological and man-made motor control networks require input from sensors to allow for modification of the motor program. Real sensory neurons are more flexible than typical robotic sensors because they are dynamic rather than static. The membrane properties of neurons and hence their excitability can be modified by the presence of neuromodulatory substances. In the case of a sensory neuron, this can change, in a functionally significant way, the code used to describe a stimulus. For instance, extension of the neuron’s dynamic range or modification of its filtering characteristics can result. This flexibility has an apparent cost. The code used may be situation-dependent and hence difficult to interpret. To address this issue and to understand how neuromodulation is used effectively in a motor control network, I am studying the GPR2 stretch receptor in the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system. Several different neuromodulatory substances can modify its encoding properties. Comparisons of physiological and anatomical evidence suggest that neuromodulation can be effected both by GPR2 itself and by other neurons in the network. These results suggest that the analog of neuromodulation might be useful for improving sensor performance in an artificial motor control system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. P. Billimoria, R. A. DiCaprio, J. T. Birmingham, L. F. Abbott, and E. Marder Neuromodulation of spike-timing precision in sensory neurons. J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5910 - 5919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Beenhakker, N. D. DeLong, S. R. Saideman, F. Nadim, and M. P. Nusbaum Proprioceptor Regulation of Motor Circuit Activity by Presynaptic Inhibition of a Modulatory Projection Neuron J. Neurosci., September 21, 2005; 25(38): 8794 - 8806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Birmingham, C. P. Billimoria, T. R. DeKlotz, R. A. Stewart, and E. Marder Differential and History-Dependent Modulation of a Stretch Receptor in the Stomatogastric System of the Crab, Cancer borealis J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3608 - 3616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. J. Blazis and F. W. Grasso Introduction Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 147 - 149. [Full Text] [PDF]