Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Chahl, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Chahl, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Insects
Right arrow Physiology
Right arrow Behavior
Biol. Bull. 200: 216-221. (April 2001)
© 2001 Marine Biological Laboratory

Landing Strategies in Honeybees, and Possible Applications to Autonomous Airborne Vehicles

Mandyam V. Srinivasan*, Shaowu Zhang and Javaan S. Chahl

Centre for Visual Science, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, P.O. Box 475, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: M.Srinivasan{at}anu.edu.au.

Insects, being perhaps more reliant on image motion cues than mammals or higher vertebrates, are proving to be an excellent organism in which to investigate how information on optic flow is exploited to guide locomotion and navigation. This paper describes one example, illustrating how bees perform grazing landings on a flat surface. A smooth landing is achieved by a surprisingly simple and elegant strategy: image velocity is held constant as the surface is approached, thus automatically ensuring that flight speed is close to zero at touchdown. No explicit knowledge of flight speed or height above the ground is necessary. The feasibility of this landing strategy is tested by implementation in a robotic gantry, and its applicability to autonomous airborne vehicles is discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. E. J. Blazis and F. W. Grasso
Introduction
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 147 - 149.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
F. W. Grasso
Invertebrate-Inspired Sensory-Motor Systems and Autonomous, Olfactory-Guided Exploration
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 160 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
T. W. Cronin and J. Marshall
Parallel Processing and Image Analysis in the Eyes of Mantis Shrimps
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 177 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
B. Webb
View From the Boundary
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. M. Higgins
Sensory Architectures for Biologically Inspired Autonomous Robotics
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.