Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deneubourg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Detrain, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deneubourg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Detrain, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Insects
Biol. Bull. 202: 262-267. (June 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Dynamics of Aggregation and Emergence of Cooperation

J. L. Deneubourg,*, A. Lioni and C. Detrain

Université Libre de Bruxelles, Unit of Social Ecology, CP 231. B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jldeneub{at}ulb.ac.be

Aggregation is one of the most basic social phenomena, and many activities of social insects are linked to it. For instance, the selection of a valuable site and the spatial organization of the population are very often by-products of amplifications based on the local density of nestmates. The patterns of aggregation are very diverse, ranging from the gathering of all animals in a unique site to their splitting between several ones. One might question how these multiple patterns emerge. Do ants actively initiate the formation of such patterns by modulating the emission of an attracting signal such as the trail pheromone? Alternatively, do patterns result from quantitative changes in the duration of interaction between animals once they have reached the gathering site, without any active modulation of the communications? To discuss these questions, we present two empirical studies: the gregarious behavior of cockroaches (Blatella) and self-assembly in the weaver ant (Oecophylla).

Through experimental and theoretical studies, we show how a single behavior—the resting time—leads to a collective choice in both species. This behavior is a response to the density of conspecifics and can also be modulated by heterogeneities in the environment. In weaver ants, it allows the colony to focus the formation of chains in a given area among several potential sites. In cockroaches, it allows the gathering of individuals in particular shelters, depending on the proximity between strains. These results are discussed with emphasis on the role of aggregation processes in the emergence of cooperativity and task allocation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. P. Hughes, J. Kathirithamby, S. Turillazzi, and L. Beani
Social wasps desert the colony and aggregate outside if parasitized: parasite manipulation?
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 1037 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. E. J. Blazis
Introduction
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 245 - 246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. Anderson
Self-Organization in Relation to Several Similar Concepts: Are the Boundaries to Self-Organization Indistinct?
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.