Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Detrain, C.
Right arrow Articles by Deneubourg, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Detrain, C.
Right arrow Articles by Deneubourg, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Insects
Right arrow Population Biology
Biol. Bull. 202: 268-274. (June 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Complexity of Environment and Parsimony of Decision Rules in Insect Societies

Claire Detrain,* and Jean-Louis Deneubourg

Unit of Social Ecology (CP 160/12), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av F. Roosevelt 50 B-1050, Brussels, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cdetrain{at}ulb.ac.be

This paper shows how colonies of social insects process information and solve problems in a complex environment, while keeping some parsimony at the level of the individuals’ decision rules. Two studies on ant foraging reveal the diversity of adaptive colony-level patterns that can be generated through self-organization, based on the same individual-level recruitment rules. Regarding prey scavenging, the "ability to retrieve the prey" rule accounts for changes in foraging patterns, with increasing prey size, that show all stages intermediate between an individual and a mass exploitation of food resources. Regarding liquid food foraging, the "ability to ingest a desired volume" rule enables a colony to adjust the number of tending ants to the honeydew production of aphids. In both cases, decision rules are based on intelligent criteria that intrinsically integrate information on multiple variables that are relevant to the ants. Furthermore, the environment can contribute directly to the emergence of collective patterns, independently of any individual behavioral changes. Each environmental factor, including abiotic ones, that alters the dynamics of information transfer in group-living animals should be reconsidered not simply as a constraint but also as a part of the decision-making process and as a agent that shapes the collective pattern.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Beekman and J. B. Lew
Foraging in honeybees--when does it pay to dance?
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 255 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-M. Ame, J. Halloy, C. Rivault, C. Detrain, and J. L. Deneubourg
Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5835 - 5840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
D. E. J. Blazis
Introduction
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 245 - 246.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
C. Anderson
Self-Organization in Relation to Several Similar Concepts: Are the Boundaries to Self-Organization Indistinct?
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.