Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Grünbaum, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Grünbaum, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Fish
Biol. Bull. 202: 296-305. (June 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties

Julia K. Parrish1,2,*, Steven V. Viscido2 and Daniel Grünbaum3

1 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Box 355020, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-5020
2 Zoology Department, University of Washington
3 School of Oceanography, University of Washington

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jparrish{at}u.washington.edu

Heterogeneous, "aggregated" patterns in the spatial distributions of individuals are almost universal across living organisms, from bacteria to higher vertebrates. Whereas specific features of aggregations are often visually striking to human eyes, a heuristic analysis based on human vision is usually not sufficient to answer fundamental questions about how and why organisms aggregate. What are the individual-level behavioral traits that give rise to these features? When qualitatively similar spatial patterns arise from purely physical mechanisms, are these patterns in organisms biologically significant, or are they simply epiphenomena that are likely characteristics of any set of interacting autonomous individuals? If specific features of spatial aggregations do confer advantages or disadvantages in the fitness of group members, how has evolution operated to shape individual behavior in balancing costs and benefits at the individual and group levels? Mathematical models of social behaviors such as schooling in fishes provide a promising avenue to address some of these questions. However, the literature on schooling models has lacked a common framework to objectively and quantitatively characterize relationships between individual-level behaviors and group-level patterns. In this paper, we briefly survey similarities and differences in behavioral algorithms and aggregation statistics among existing schooling models. We present preliminary results of our efforts to develop a modeling framework that synthesizes much of this previous work, and to identify relationships between behavioral parameters and group-level statistics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. J. W. Ward, D. J. T. Sumpter, I. D. Couzin, P. J. B. Hart, and J. Krause
From the Cover: Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6948 - 6953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. L. Romey and E. Galbraith
Optimal group positioning after a predator attack: the influence of speed, sex, and satiation within mobile whirligig swarms
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, et al.
From the Cover: Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study
PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1232 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. J. Morrell and R. James
Mechanisms for aggregation in animals: rule success depends on ecological variables
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 193 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Matsumura, S. Matsunaga, and N. Fusetani
Phosphatidylcholine profile-mediated group recognition in catfish
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1992 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Kolpas, J. Moehlis, and I. G. Kevrekidis
Coarse-grained analysis of stochasticity-induced switching between collective motion states
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5931 - 5935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wang, T. Badea, and J. Nathans
Order from disorder: Self-organization in mammalian hair patterning
PNAS, December 26, 2006; 103(52): 19800 - 19805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. E. J. Blazis
Introduction
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 245 - 246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. Anderson
Self-Organization in Relation to Several Similar Concepts: Are the Boundaries to Self-Organization Indistinct?
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.