|
|
||||||||
1 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Box 355020, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-5020
2 Zoology Department, University of Washington
3 School of Oceanography, University of Washington
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jparrish{at}u.washington.edu
Heterogeneous, "aggregated" patterns in the spatial distributions of individuals are almost universal across living organisms, from bacteria to higher vertebrates. Whereas specific features of aggregations are often visually striking to human eyes, a heuristic analysis based on human vision is usually not sufficient to answer fundamental questions about how and why organisms aggregate. What are the individual-level behavioral traits that give rise to these features? When qualitatively similar spatial patterns arise from purely physical mechanisms, are these patterns in organisms biologically significant, or are they simply epiphenomena that are likely characteristics of any set of interacting autonomous individuals? If specific features of spatial aggregations do confer advantages or disadvantages in the fitness of group members, how has evolution operated to shape individual behavior in balancing costs and benefits at the individual and group levels? Mathematical models of social behaviors such as schooling in fishes provide a promising avenue to address some of these questions. However, the literature on schooling models has lacked a common framework to objectively and quantitatively characterize relationships between individual-level behaviors and group-level patterns. In this paper, we briefly survey similarities and differences in behavioral algorithms and aggregation statistics among existing schooling models. We present preliminary results of our efforts to develop a modeling framework that synthesizes much of this previous work, and to identify relationships between behavioral parameters and group-level statistics.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. W. Ward, D. J. T. Sumpter, I. D. Couzin, P. J. B. Hart, and J. Krause From the Cover: Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6948 - 6953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Romey and E. Galbraith Optimal group positioning after a predator attack: the influence of speed, sex, and satiation within mobile whirligig swarms Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 338 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, et al. From the Cover: Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1232 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Morrell and R. James Mechanisms for aggregation in animals: rule success depends on ecological variables Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 193 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsumura, S. Matsunaga, and N. Fusetani Phosphatidylcholine profile-mediated group recognition in catfish J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1992 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kolpas, J. Moehlis, and I. G. Kevrekidis Coarse-grained analysis of stochasticity-induced switching between collective motion states PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5931 - 5935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, T. Badea, and J. Nathans Order from disorder: Self-organization in mammalian hair patterning PNAS, December 26, 2006; 103(52): 19800 - 19805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. J. Blazis Introduction Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 245 - 246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Anderson Self-Organization in Relation to Several Similar Concepts: Are the Boundaries to Self-Organization Indistinct? Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 247 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |