Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farley, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farley, G. S.
Biol. Bull. 203: 51-57. (August 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Helical Nature of Sperm Swimming Affects the Fit of Fertilization-Kinetics Models to Empirical Data

Gregory S. Farley

Department of Biological Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

Models of fertilization kinetics rely upon estimates of the swimming velocity of sperm to predict collision rates between egg and sperm. Most investigators measure sperm swimming velocity without accounting for the helical motion of sperm, thereby obtaining an inflated estimate of the velocity with which sperm approach eggs. In turn, models of fertilization predict inflated rates of sperm/egg collision. I observed sea urchin sperm colliding with eggs, quantified the rate of sperm/egg collision, and measured sperm velocity as a component of the helix through which they swim. I also adjusted the "target size" of eggs to reflect the diameter of the helix. My estimate of sperm swimming velocity is an order of magnitude lower than other estimates for the same species. By using helical parameters in fertilization kinetics models and accounting for dead sperm in laboratory trials, I was able to accurately predict lower rates of sperm/egg collision. Moreover, making these adjustments in the model increased the estimated proportion of sperm that initiate fertilization by 6- to 7-fold, suggesting that a better understanding of sperm swimming might lead to a more complete understanding of fertilization biology and natural selection on gamete traits.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. V. Inamdar, T. Kim, Y.-K. Chung, A. M. Was, X. Xiang, C.-W. Wang, S. Takayama, C. M. Lastoskie, F. I. M. Thomas, and A. M. Sastry
Assessment of sperm chemokinesis with exposure to jelly coats of sea urchin eggs and resact: a microfluidic experiment and numerical study
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3805 - 3820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. R. Levitan
The relationship between egg size and fertilization success in broadcast-spawning marine invertebrates
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 46(3): 298 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.