Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staver, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Strathmann, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staver, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Strathmann, R. R.
Biol. Bull. 203: 58-69. (August 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Evolution of Fast Development of Planktonic Embryos to Early Swimming

Jennifer M. Staver and Richard R. Strathmann,*

Friday Harbor Laboratories and Department of Zoology, University of Washington, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, Washington 98250

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rrstrath{at}u.washington.edu

Planktonic embryos of marine animals swim at an early stage and age. Although natural selection has apparently favored rapid development of structures for swimming, taxa have not converged on the same, minimal time from first cell division to first swimming. Comparisons of 34 species with planktonic embryos in 10 phyla revealed factors that account for variation in time to swimming. Time to first swimming correlated significantly with time from first to second cleavage (first cell cycle) in analyses of all embryos sampled and separately within the Spiralia and Echinodermata. Time to first swimming also correlated significantly with egg diameter in some clades, but not in all. Correlations between egg diameter and cell cycle duration were low except for the three species of Urochordata. Development to a feeding or nonfeeding larva did not affect time to first swimming beyond effects attributable to egg size. Time to first swimming did not correlate with type of locomotion developed (uniciliated cells, multiciliated cells, or muscle). Nonetheless, differences in locomotion are associated with changes in cell cycle durations prior to swimming. The ratios of time to first swimming and time for first cell cycle suggests that allocation of time to multiplication of cells versus differentiation of cells is resolved differently in species with different types of locomotion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. J. Marshall and T. F. Bolton
Effects of Egg Size on the Development Time of Non-feeding Larvae
Biol. Bull., February 1, 2007; 212(1): 6 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
K. MCDonald
Patterns in Early Embryonic Motility: Effects of Size and Environmental Temperature on Vertical Velocities of Sinking and Swimming Echinoid Blastulae
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2004; 207(2): 93 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.