Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, M. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Biomaterials
Biol. Bull. 203: 338-346. (December 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Biochemical Differences Between Trail Mucus and Adhesive Mucus From Marsh Periwinkle Snails

Andrew M. Smith* and Martha C. Morin

Department of Biology, Center for Natural Sciences, Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York 14850

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: asmith{at}ithaca.edu

The composition of the adhesive form of marsh periwinkle mucus was compared to the trail mucus used during locomotion. The trail mucus consists primarily of large, carbohydrate-rich molecules with some relatively small proteins. In contrast, the adhesive mucus has 2.7 times as much protein with no significant difference in carbohydrate concentration. The resulting gel has roughly equal amounts of protein and carbohydrate. This substantial increase in protein content is due to the additional presence of two proteins with molecular weights of 41 and 36 kD. These two proteins are absent from the trail mucus. Both proteins are glycosylated, have similar amino acid compositions, and have isoelectric points of 4.75. This change in composition corresponds to an order of magnitude increase in tenacity with little clear change in overall concentration. The difference between adhesive and non-adhesive mucus suggests that relatively small proteins are important for controlling the mechanics of periwinkle mucus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. H. Ewoldt, A. E. Hosoi, and G. H. McKinley
Nonlinear viscoelastic biomaterials: meaningful characterization and engineering inspiration
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 49(1): 40 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. W. Werneke, C. Swann, L. A. Farquharson, K. S. Hamilton, and A. M. Smith
The role of metals in molluscan adhesive gels
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2137 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
M. S Davies and J. Blackwell
Energy saving through trail following in a marine snail
Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2007; 274(1614): 1233 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. M. Pawlicki, L. B. Pease, C. M. Pierce, T. P. Startz, Y. Zhang, and A. M. Smith
The effect of molluscan glue proteins on gel mechanics
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1127 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. M. Smith
The Structure and Function of Adhesive Gels from Invertebrates
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1164 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.