HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bergman, D. A. Articles by Moore, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bergman, D. A. Articles by Moore, P. A. Related Collections Behavior Crustaceans Ecology

Field Observations of Intraspecific Agonistic Behavior of Two Crayfish Species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in Different Habitats

Laboratory for Sensory Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences and the J. P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind, and Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403; and University of Michigan Biological Station, 9008 Biological Road, Pellston, Michigan 49769

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pmoore{at}bgnet.bgsu.edu

Agonistic behavior is a fundamental aspect of ecological theories on resource acquisition and sexual selection. Crustaceans are exemplary models for agonistic behavior within the laboratory, but agonistic behavior in natural habitats is often neglected. Laboratory studies do not achieve the same ecological realism as field studies. In an attempt to connect laboratory results to field data and investigate how habitat structure affects agonistic interactions, the nocturnal behavior of two crayfish species was observed by scuba diving and snorkeling in two northern Michigan lakes. Intraspecific agonistic interactions were analyzed in three habitats: two food resources—macrophytes and detritus—and one sheltered habitat. The overall observations reinforce the concept that resources influence agonistic bouts. Fights in the presence of shelters were longer and more intense, suggesting that shelters have a higher perceived value than food resources. Fights in the presence of detritus patches had higher average intensities and ended with more tailflips away from an opponent, suggesting that detritus was a more valuable food resource than macrophytes. In addition, observations of aggressive behavior within a natural setting can add validity to laboratory studies. When fights in nature are compared with laboratory fights, those in nature are shorter, less intense, and less likely to end with a tailflip, but do show the fundamental fight dynamics associated with laboratory studies. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors affect intraspecific aggression in many ways, and both should always be recognized as having the potential to alter agonistic behavior.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Herberholz, C. McCurdy, and D. H. Edwards Direct Benefits of Social Dominance in Juvenile Crayfish Biol. Bull., August 1, 2007; 213(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Moore and D. A. Bergman The Smell of Success and Failure: the Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Chemical Signals on the Social Behavior of Crayfish Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 45(4): 650 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Bergman and P. A. Moore The Role of Chemical Signals in the Social Behavior of Crayfish Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i305 - i306. [Full Text] [PDF]