HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pernet, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pernet, B. Related Collections Development Evolution Annelids Larval Biology

Persistent Ancestral Feeding Structures in Nonfeeding Annelid Larvae

Friday Harbor Laboratories, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, Washington 98250

Evolutionary loss of the requirement for feeding in larvae of marine invertebrates is often followed by loss of structures involved in capturing and digesting food. Studies of echinoderms suggest that larval form evolves rapidly in response to loss of the requirement for feeding, but a lack of data from other taxa makes it difficult to assess the generality of this result. I show that many members of a large clade of annelids, the Sabellidae, retain ancestral systems for particle capture despite loss of the need and ability to feed. In at least one species, Schizobranchia insignis, an opposed-band system of prototrochal, food-groove, and metatrochal ciliary bands can concentrate suspended particles and transport them to the mouth, but captured particles are invariably rejected because larvae lack a functional gut. The persistence of particle capture systems in larvae of sabellids suggests that they have lost larval feeding very recently, that opposed bands are inexpensive to construct and operate, or that opposed bands have some alternative function. These observations also suggest a hypothesis on how the ability to feed is lost in larvae of annelids and other spiralians following increases in egg size.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Nielsen How Did Indirect Development With Planktotrophic Larvae Evolve? Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 203 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Page Molluscan Larvae: Pelagic Juveniles or Slowly Metamorphosing Larvae? Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 216 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Collin, O. R. Chaparro, F. Winkler, and D. Veliz Molecular Phylogenetic and Embryological Evidence That Feeding Larvae Have Been Reacquired in a Marine Gastropod Biol. Bull., April 1, 2007; 212(2): 83 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Strathmann and D. Grunbaum Good eaters, poor swimmers: compromises in larval form Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 46(3): 312 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]