Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keller, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weissburg, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keller, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weissburg, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Crustaceans
Biol. Bull. 207: 44-55. (August 2004)
© 2004 Marine Biological Laboratory

Effects of Odor Flux and Pulse Rate on Chemosensory Tracking in Turbulent Odor Plumes by the Blue Crab, Callinectes sapidus

Troy A. Keller1 and Marc J. Weissburg2

School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 310 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marc.weissburg{at}biology.gatech.edu

The ability of animals to track through chemical plumes is often related to properties of evanescent odor bursts and to small-scale mixing process that determine burst properties. However, odor plumes contain variation over a range of scales, and little is known about how variation in the properties of the odor signal on the scale of one to several seconds affects foraging performance. We examined how flux and pulse rate interact to modulate the search behavior of blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, locating odor sources in controlled flume flows. Experimental treatments consisted of continuous plumes and plumes with discrete odor pulses at intervals of 2.5 s and 4 s at two fluxes. Crabs experienced diminished search success and reduced search efficiency as flux decreased and the inter-pulse interval lengthened. There often were significant interactions between flux and pulse length, and neither property completely determined search behavior. Thus, over the time span of several seconds, the blue crab chemosensory system is not a simple flux detector. The sensitivity of blue crabs to inter-pulse intervals in the range of several seconds indicates that larger-scale mixing processes, which create odor variation on comparable scales, may exert a significant impact on foraging success in nature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
M.A.R. Koehl
The Fluid Mechanics of Arthropod Sniffing in Turbulent Odor Plumes
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
G. A Wright, M. G.A Thomson, and B. H Smith
Odour concentration affects odour identity in honeybees
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2005; 272(1579): 2417 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. C. Ferner and M. J. Weissburg
Slow-moving predatory gastropods track prey odors in fast and turbulent flow
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2005; 208(5): 809 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.