Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conner, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, A. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conner, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Insects
Right arrow Miscellaneous Invertebrates
Right arrow Miscellaneous Vertebrates
Right arrow Neuroscience
Biol. Bull. 213: 267-273. (December 2007)
© 2007 Marine Biological Laboratory

Has Vertebrate Chemesthesis Been a Selective Agent in the Evolution of Arthropod Chemical Defenses?

William E. Conner*, Kerensa M. Alley, Jonathan R. Barry and Amanda E. Harper

Wake Forest University, Department of Biology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: conner{at}wfu.edu

Arthropods use a variety of chemical substances to repel potential predators, but how did they arrive at the suite of chemicals that they use? One way to explore this question is to map chemically defended arthropod species in a multidimensional "compound" space. Clustering within this space indicates species that share similar combinations of chemical compounds and can reflect a phylogenetic signal, common biochemical pathways, or both. More important for this study, clustering can help to identify allomone targets. We herein compare common arthropod allomones with known vertebrate trigeminal irritants. We argue that the degree of overlap between these two groups of compounds indicates that chemesthesis was an important determining factor in the evolution of many arthropod allomones. The multidimensional scaling methods used may also allow the identification of new irritant receptors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. K. Zimmer and C. D. Derby
Biological Bulletin Virtual Symposium: The Neuroecology of Chemical Defense
Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 205 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. D. Derby
Escape by Inking and Secreting: Marine Molluscs Avoid Predators Through a Rich Array of Chemicals and Mechanisms
Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 274 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.