Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Briones-Fourzán, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lozano-Álvarez, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Briones-Fourzán, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lozano-Álvarez, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Crustaceans
Biol. Bull. 215: 182-190. (October 2008)
© 2008 Marine Biological Laboratory

Influence of Conspecific and Heterospecific Aggregation Cues and Alarm Odors on Shelter Choice by Syntopic Spiny Lobsters

Patricia Briones-Fourzán*, Eunice Ramírez-Zaldívar and Enrique Lozano-Álvarez

Unidad Académica Puerto Morelos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, PO Box 1152, Cancún, Q.R., 77500 Mexico

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: briones{at}mar.icmyl.unam.mx

In spiny lobsters, conspecific scents ("aggregation cues") may mediate gregarious diurnal sheltering, but scents from injured conspecifics ("alarm odors") may elicit avoidance behavior. In laboratory experiments, individuals of two coexisting species, Panulirus guttatus (a reef-obligate) and P. argus (a temporary reef-dweller), significantly chose shelters emanating conspecific aggregation cues and responded randomly to shelters emanating heterospecific aggregation cues. However, despite evidence that the two species perceived each other's alarm odors to a similar extent, P. guttatus responded randomly to shelters emanating either conspecific or heterospecific alarm odors, whereas P. argus significantly avoided both. This differential influence of alarm odors likely reflects interspecific differences in life history, sociality, and behavior. The less social, reef-obligate P. guttatus lobsters forage close to their reef dens, into which they retract deeply upon perception of risk. This cryptic behavior may offset the need to avoid conspecific (and heterospecific) alarm odors. In contrast, avoidance of conspecific alarm odors by P. argus is consistent with its ontogenetic habitat shifts and greater sociality. Furthermore, because reef-dwelling P. argus lobsters forage across open areas away from the reef, an ability to avoid alarm odors from P. guttatus upon returning to their reef dens may increase their fitness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Shabani, M. Kamio, and C. D. Derby
Spiny lobsters use urine-borne olfactory signaling and physical aggressive behaviors to influence social status of conspecifics
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2009; 212(15): 2464 - 2474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.