Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page, L. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Development
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Larval Biology
Right arrow Molluscs
Biol. Bull. 216: 216-225. (June 2009)
© 2009 Marine Biological Laboratory

Molluscan Larvae: Pelagic Juveniles or Slowly Metamorphosing Larvae?

Louise R. Page

Department of Biology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3020 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N5, Canada

E-mail: lpage{at}uvic.ca

Asking the right questions about evolution of development, larval morphology, and life history requires knowledge of ancestral state. Two hypotheses dominate current opinion about the ancestral life cycle of bilaterians: the "larva-first" and the "intercalation" hypotheses. Until recently, the larva-first hypothesis was preeminent. This proposes that the original indirect life cycle of bilaterians included a planktotrophic larva followed by a benthic adult. Phylogenetic evidence suggests that a planktotrophic larva is plesiomorphic for echinoderms. A preponderance of developmental studies on echinoderms may have fostered a tendency to extrapolate conclusions about echinoderm development to other clades, particularly the concept that larval and juvenile/adult bodies are mostly separate entities. However, some of the recent reconstructions of bilaterian phylogeny suggest that nonfeeding larvae may have been ancestral for bilaterians, and these may have been intercalated into a life cycle that was originally direct. I review comparative data on molluscan development that suggests the trochophore-like stage is little more than a gastrula with transient structures (prototroch and apical sensory organ) to allow a temporary planktonic phase during development. Most lineage founder cells of molluscan embryos generate progeny that develop through the veliger stage into structures of the juvenile, which becomes benthic when the prototroch and apical sensory organ are lost. In light of this, the model of separate larval and juvenile bodies with the latter developing from nests of multipotent cells within the larva is inappropriate for molluscs. The intercalation hypothesis may be a better model for interpreting development of molluscs and other lophotrochozoans.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. I. Williamson
Reply to Giribet: Caterpillars evolved from onychophorans by hybridogenesis
PNAS, November 24, 2009; 106(47): E132 - E132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. I. Williamson
Caterpillars evolved from onychophorans by hybridogenesis
PNAS, November 24, 2009; 106(47): 19901 - 19905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. B. Emlet, S. A. Maslakova, A. L. Shanks, and C. M. Young
Biological Bulletin Virtual Symposium: Biology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 201 - 202.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.